Conflict of interest declaration: Celeste E Naude

This version of the conflict of interest declarations has been replaced with new declaration of interest submissions.
View new declaration of interest submissions
This submission is more than 12 months old!

Updated on: 24 February 2022

Roles in: Cochrane Nutrition

1. Financial interests

a) Received research funding: any grant, contract or gift, commissioned research, or fellowship from The Cochrane Collaboration or a related organisation (i.e. any organisation related to health care or medical research) to conduct research?
Yes - Jan 2019 to present: my position at Stellenbosch University, South Africa, is partially supported by the Research, Evidence and Development Initiative (READ-It). READ-It (project number 300342-104) is funded by UK aid from the UK government 2021-2022: WHO provided funding to Stellenbosch University, South Africa, to support my role as a Methodologist for a WHO guideline development group 2020 and 2022: WHO provided funding to Stellenbosch University, South Africa, to commission 2 scoping reviews for guideline development 2020: WHO provided funding to Stellenbosch University, South Africa, to commission a systematic review for guideline development

b) Had paid consultancies: any paid work, consulting fees (in cash or kind) from a related organisation?
No

c) Received honoraria: one-time payments (in cash or kind) from a related organisation?
No

d) Served as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or held a position of management with a related organisation?
No

e) Possessed share-holdings, stock, stock options, equity with a related organisation (excludes mutual funds or similar arrangements where the individual has no control over the selection of the shares)?
No

f) Received personal gifts from a related organisation?
No

g) Had an outstanding loan with a related organisation?
No

h) Received royalty payments from a related organisation?
No

2. Do you have any other competing interests that could pose a conflict of interest that would reasonably appear to be related to the primary interest?
No